return Home

Google’s ad placement headache (and why publishers may feel a touch of schadenfreude)

Google YouTube logos ()

A disregard for brand safety stands at the centre of the Google display and video ad fiasco. The US search giant, by its own admission, left inadequate automation in charge of ad placement. We look at the issue.

The high profile withdrawal by several global brands including Volkswagen, Toyota, Tesco, ITV, Aviva, Heinz and even the UK Government, of advertising on Google and YouTube, followed media investigations revealing that many of these companies were being advertised alongside videos posted by extremists, hate preachers, rape apologists, white nationalists and other undesirable or controversial content.

While initial reports suggested 250 companies - mostly in the UK and mainland Europe - suspended advertising with Google, there was no initial worldwide blanket withdrawal. Yet, the scandal did wash across the Atlantic to US shores with two of the world's largest telcos, AT&T and Verizon, as well as Johnson & Johnson and car rental giant Enterprise Holdings joining a growing list of brands outside of Europe to stop advertising with Google.

Within advertising agencies itself, there seems to be no unified stance. Havas Media, the French advertising giant that operates in 144 countries was the first to press pause on Google advertising on behalf of its UK clients and also the first to announce that they “will not be undertaking such measures on a global basis”. Instead a statement on behalf of Havas’ Asia Pacific Region (APAC) read: “The decision of our UK team to pause activity with our partner Google is a temporary move made on behalf of our UK clients and their specific needs... We are working with Google to resolve the issues so that we can return to using this valuable platform in the UK.”

This was echoed by WPP’s GroupM who said they would also not adopt a blanket ban, but will work “with concerned individual clients” to craft solutions. Publicis Media APAC was quoted by media and marketing website Mumbrella Asia as saying they are “committed to being at the forefront of rigorous brand safety” and hold all publishers accountable “to ensure that the highest standards of advertising are consistently met”. They continue to place adverts on behalf of clients with Google.

Getting it wrong

There’s little doubt that Google fell short of meeting standards and they admitted as much with Philipp Schindler, chief business officer at Google saying in a blog post, “we have strict policies that define where Google ads should appear, and in the vast majority of cases, our policies and tools work as intended. But at times we don’t get it right”.

This was a repeat of what Ronan Harris, managing director of Google UK said earlier in a public comment titled ‘Improving our brand safety controls’. His argument hinged on the fact that “with millions of sites in the Google network and 400 hours of video uploaded to YouTube every minute, we recognise that we don't always get it right. In a very small percentage of cases, ads appear against content that violates our monetisation policies. We promptly remove the ads in those instances, but we know we can and must do more.”

But can they? If you take Harris on the letter of his word, 65 years of video gets uploaded to YouTube every day. To make good on his promise will either take a sudden quantum leap in sophisticated automation technology or employing human eyes at a rate - and cost - yet to be calculated to be able to truly reassure brands that it is safe to return to YouTube, or anywhere else on the internet for that matter.

Get stories like these every week directly in your inbox. Subscribe to our (free) FIPP World newsletter.

The Google-gate fallout is hardly a surprise, and not limited to just one company. While some brands claim this is the first time they have realised their ads appeared in ‘dodgy places’, it’s been happening all along and forewarned for years. Buyers of programmatic ads might have been told that tools exist to prevent ads from showing up in brand hostile environments like porn, gambling, fake news or hate speech sites, but shortcomings have been there since the very beginning. And at times even technology can’t be blamed. 

In November last year Digiday warned that there is “a degree of fraud” prevalent in “anything ad tech”, while FIPP also wrote extensively on the topic of ad fraud here, here and here in the last couple of years.

The site said “although blacklists can block ads from appearing on any given site, agencies and performance marketing vendors aren’t always incentivised to use them since much of digital media buying is still premised on cheap reach.” 

They quoted Michael Horn, managing director of data science at Huge saying: “If you’re an agency who’s incentivised only on efficiency of delivery, this is the kind of site you’re tempted to keep on the plan, even when the effect is to fund hate speech… It’s a position clients knowingly or unknowingly push their agencies into, and agencies don’t always have the time or will to push back.”

Given this backdrop, it’s worth taking a more sobering view of the now over publicised criticism directed at both Google and Facebook. There is the suggestion by Sir Martin Sorrell, chief executive of the world’s largest marketing services group WPP, that these giants cannot masquerade as technology companies while placing advertisements and that both should have the same responsibilities as any other media company. WPP continues to spend significant percentages of digital ad budgets on Google and Facebook.

Brand safety

Disregard for brand safety is a big issue and will have global repercussions. USA Today quotes analyst Brian Wieser of Pivotal Research Group who argues that brand safety has emerged as the biggest issue facing the advertising industry today. “For large marketers, even one ad placed next to extremist content can cause untold harm to a brand”.

Brands should be concerned about where their ads appear, on the internet or otherwise. But more importantly, they should also be concerned with how the decisions are taken for placing their ads. If they did this in the first place, it would not have landed in close proximity to inappropriate content.

It’s easy to argue - but hard to prove - that ad agencies and social platforms are not as concerned about brand value as profit. Yet, action speaks louder than words. If Google can be taken only on words (the reaction to the latest scandal), then advertisers and agencies will soon have transparent tools to see where their ads are running. Google say they will also be hiring “significant numbers of people and developing new tools powered by latest advancements”. They will “act swiftly to put these new policies and processes in place…”. This will be done “carefully, preserving the value we currently provide to advertisers, publishers and creators of all sizes”.

There are of course other ways for brands to attempt to (re)-take control of ad placement. One would be to hold agencies accountable for inappropriate placements, which can be dealt with by adding a straightforward penalty clause to the initial contract.

Then maybe the likes of Google and Facebook will start to take collective responsibility for ad placement and invest more rigorously in both effective big data solutions and the staff to overcome any technology shortcomings.

* Magazine media publishers, who have long demonstrated how effective advertising in tightly segmented and positioned brands can be, may be forgiven a touch of schadenfreude upon hearing about Google’s pain. Here is a story and chart from our archive on magazine ad effectiveness:

Guy Consterdine article.

Statista Chart of the week

More like this

From our archive: What are the nine types of digital ad fraud?

You probably think digital ad fraud doesn’t affect you. Think again.

Ad fraud on mobile the next battleground for publishers

Worldwide digital ad trends: FB and Google dominate; Snapchat to grow; 3 x Chinese giants the only potential rivals

  • Nordic warrior: transforming revenue models at Schibsted

    Norwegian-headquartered media giant Schibsted is often held up as a business that has transformed itself in recent years to remain relevant and thriving. Tor Jacobsen, SVP and chief consumer officer at Schibsted Media explains how the company has retained a focus on revenue generation during that transformation, and the role data is playing in driving growth.

    19th Jun 2019 Features
  • Finding a home at Penske Media, Rolling Stone 'poised to continue to tell world's most important stories... for decades to come'

    For over 50 years, Rolling Stone has been iconic in its coverage of music and popular culture, political journalism and commentary. From the Beatles' Magical Mystery tour to Shawn Mendes, Rolling Stone has covered the greatest rockstars, the hottest celebrities, the biggest political stories. Called a 'counterculture bible' by The New York Times, the magazine has launched careers, defined what was cool, inspired a rock song, been embroiled in controversy, and over the last two years, found a new home with Penske Media Corporation. 

    17th Jun 2019 Features
  • How to fix broken digital ad models

    Despite popular belief, subscriptions and paywalls will not be the silver bullet most digital publishers have been waiting for. Instead, publishers should be exploring innovation in digital advertising formats, said Jessica Rovello, co-founder and CEO, Arkadium, USA, at this year's Digital Innovators' Summit in Berlin. She proposed four new formats as a good place to start.

    17th Jun 2019 Features
  • American and European publishers learn from each other as advertising models converge

    In March, I attended the FIPP Digital Innovators’ Summit in Berlin and left with the realisation that advertising-related problems in Europe are the same ones we’re facing in America: media fragmentation, a failing business model, fraud, and the emergence of social platforms that distribute our content for free and control the ad spend.

    12th Jun 2019 Features
  • Finding a home at Penske Media, Rolling Stone 'poised to continue to tell world's most important stories... for decades to come'

    For over 50 years, Rolling Stone has been iconic in its coverage of music and popular culture, political journalism and commentary. From the Beatles' Magical Mystery tour to Shawn Mendes, Rolling Stone has covered the greatest rockstars, the hottest celebrities, the biggest political stories. Called a 'counterculture bible' by The New York Times, the magazine has launched careers, defined what was cool, inspired a rock song, been embroiled in controversy, and over the last two years, found a new home with Penske Media Corporation. 

    17th Jun 2019 Features
  • How to fix broken digital ad models

    Despite popular belief, subscriptions and paywalls will not be the silver bullet most digital publishers have been waiting for. Instead, publishers should be exploring innovation in digital advertising formats, said Jessica Rovello, co-founder and CEO, Arkadium, USA, at this year's Digital Innovators' Summit in Berlin. She proposed four new formats as a good place to start.

    17th Jun 2019 Features
  • Condé Nast International launches Vogue Business Talent

    Condé Nast International today announced the launch of Vogue Business Talent, a curated recruitment platform for professionals seeking opportunities with the world’s leading fashion brands. The new platform, launching with selected opportunities in London, New York, Paris, Milan and Hong Kong forms part of Vogue Business, the online B2B publication launched in January 2019.

    12th Jun 2019 Industry News
  • Chart of the week: Where do people find news on their smartphones?

    A little under half of the people in the United Kingdom and Finland said they first referred to news websites or apps when using a smartphone for news, according to Reuters most recent Digital News Report. While around half of people in the United States and Italy said they used social media and messaging apps when initially engaging with news on their smartphones.

    17th Jun 2019 Insight News
  • Hearst UK survey reveals people in a positive mind-set are 90 per cent more likely to buy a product they have seen advertised

    Hearst UK has commissioned a comprehensive piece of research with Theobalds Road, on the power of positivity. According to the research, people with a positive outlook on life are much more open minded and purposeful, and much more receptive to commercial messages. Thus, making them a key audience for advertisers.

    11th Jun 2019 Insight News
Go to Full Site