return Home

Media buyers should be more like pension managers

It’s easy to find people with the next big investment idea to plough all your money into – talking heads on TV, your neighbour, or that “inside tip” from a broker. I bet you know someone who can’t shut up about Bitcoin, and all the money they’ve made from it! But these are not investment strategies, they are bets.

 

Rezonence exec ()

 

Instead (now that we all have pensions) take a look at your pension manager’s investment strategy. Boring I know, but let’s not forget, these are the people you are wholly relying on to keep you in the life to which you have become accustomed all the way through your (fingers crossed) long retirement.

You may be starting to wonder what I am writing about, and what on earth this has to do with media buying. But hear me out, there is method to my madness!

 

The pensions world

When you are looking at your quarterly report, you will very quickly note that they don’t seem to be following the same “strategy” of ploughing all their money into that one big idea.

Pension and long term investors diversify, buying from a range of different areas. The goal is not necessarily to boost performance, but to mitigate risk. By making sure every area is covered, but no one area is overly exposed, you won’t have lost too much if something goes bust.

To provide a simple and current example. It’s speculated that the Bank of England will raise interest rates soon (up to two per cent in the next twelve months at the time of writing), however this is not guaranteed. So if you put all your money into bank shares on the hopes that rates rise and they don’t, you will underperform. You might be better off investing part of your money in banks, and another part in companies that build houses (low interest means high house prices).

By covering both angles, whatever happens we don’t lose. And this my friends is investing, not betting.

 

How does media fare?

Media buying has often been compared to financial markets and indeed there are a lot of similarities. Both seem to have investment managers, real-time bidding is comparable with the trading platforms and huge amounts of money are being transacted on a daily basis.

With the rise of GDPR, media buyers are having to become risk managers, not just growth hackers. With four per cent of global turnover at risk for non-compliance to any European consumer, this is no laughing matter.

I would go one further and say that they need to become portfolio managers. But at present the strategies of the investment managers from the two industries couldn’t be further apart. Whilst the financial investment managers have been busy diversifying to mitigate risk, Media investment teams have optimised their buying, backing the winning horse based on prior results again and again.

The results are already documented. But in light of the current backlash that both platforms have received, there is an outcry from the media industry for a healthy third competitor to the duopoly.

 

Here comes my point

To build a healthy third competitor you must back several players, and slowly reduce the exposure on the existing two players. This means lots of work.

When investing in a stock, you need to perform due diligence on the management team, the financial statements and the wider sector. This is no different to investing in media. It will take the same amount of work to understand the USPs of a vendor’s tech, get sign-off for creative, set up the campaign, install the trackers and review performance.

Furthermore – remember from earlier – financial investment managers are not looking for immediate outperformance, but sustainable long term performance. So whilst one vendor may not be performing as well, optimising is actually increasing your risk profile for a sustainable future.

The bottom line: to achieve your long-term goal of building a prosperous and sustainable Media industry, you need to balance risk and reward. Choosing the right mix of Tech investments, based on both the short-term and long-term is essential.

If all of this is underpinned by sound relationships and periodically rebalancing, you can make a big difference in the outcome of a sustainable internet with healthy competition and free access for consumers.

Or you could put all your money in Bitcoin, and see how that works out 😉

More like this

The warning signs are there, but are we looking?

  • 'How we take responsibility' - by Päivi Rissanen, director, sustainability, UPM Communication Papers

    At UPM Communication Papers we have a long history of demonstrating responsibility for the environment. But few people know that our sustainability agenda extends to also include a commitment to taking care of people and society throughout the value chain whilst simultaneously creating value for our customers through delivering products with high sustainability credentials. 

    26th Nov 2018 Opinion
  • Engage your mobile audience: how to create mobile-friendly stories

    Forty-four per cent of the world’s news consumers get their news primarily via the smartphone, Reuters Institute states in its 2018 Digital News Report. But although technology has changed the distribution of news dramatically, the stories are still told in the same way as they were 100 years ago.

    19th Nov 2018 Opinion
  • For leaders who never stop learning

    They say that being a CEO is one of the loneliest jobs in the world. It’s particularly difficult when their organisation is facing, or in the midst of, disruption – a word that’s overused, yes, but also one that fits the bill because it epitomises the intensity of confusion, panic, and distraction that comes with massive technical and social changes.

    19th Oct 2018 Opinion
  • Magazines and the attention economy

    Billionaires are not buying prestigious book publishers or TV channels. What is so special about magazines or newspaper periodicals?

    18th Oct 2018 Opinion
Go to Full Site