return Home

From The New York Times to Quartz, which publisher is king of the visual web?

Millennials don’t read, they scan. A generation of readers is caught in a perpetual scroll, so it’s no surprise that publishers that aim to capture that coveted demographic are leaning toward images to catch (if not hold) their attention.

“You’re not reading every article, you’re reading across articles,” said Kyle Outlaw, group experience director and UX expert at Razorfish. “Images help you to quickly scan what’s going on. That’s where images and headlines are really coming together.”

Digital media and its first native audience might not have killed the broadsheet-approach to news, but it’s definitely doing its best to replace it with the feed. “Visuals show your experiences without telling people about them,” said Anindya Ghose, professor of marketing, information, operations and management sciences at NYU’s Stern School of Business, in our recent publisher report. “This allows viewers not to spam their audience or overload them with textual information.”

Glossy images now reign supreme above the fold on most of today’s top sites, and even below there’s a stronger emphasis on showing over telling. But as usual, there are winners and losers; not all publishers handle this with the same panache.

To see where a handful of the top news sites stack up in this visual arms race, we analysed four homepages, some Millennial-first, some traditional, by checking the proportion of pixel real estate held by images and visual content. Razorfish’s Outlaw put those ratings in context.

Visit here for the rest of the article. 

Source: Digiday

More like this

Blippar develops 'visual browser for the physical world'

Visual search – the next frontier?

Beyond the darkroom: How to optimise strategies for the visual web

Go to Full Site