Consumers can’t tell native ads from editorial content

The study, titled “Going Native: Effects of Disclosure Position and Language on the Recognition and Evaluation of Online Native Advertising,” investigated how consumers react to the size and placement of native ad disclosure statements in online news articles.

In the first experiment, the researchers asked subjects to read online content with two stories, one editorial and one presenting native advertising. They displayed 12 different versions of the ad, with varying types of disclosure labels (“advertising,” “sponsored by,” “brand voice,” and “presented by”), as well as different positions for the disclosure label including at the top, middle, and bottom of the page.

The subjects were made to read the native ad first, followed by the real news story, then asked to distinguish which was which.

Overall, only 17 out of 242 subjects — under 8 per cent — were able to identify native advertising as a paid marketing message in this experiment. The experiment also revealed that consumers are seven times more likely to identify paid content as a native ad when it is marked with terms like “advertising or “sponsored content” than if it carries terms like “brand voice” or “presented by.”

Read the full article here

Source: MediaPost

More like this

Download Innovation 2015 chapter: Will native advertising save or kill your brand?

Editorial or native advertising: The key to success is to be reader-centric

Your first step to joining FIPP's global community of media leaders

Sign up to FIPP World x