return Home

Is InDesign now becoming redundant for digital magazine publishers?

"I want it pixel perfect!" is no longer a relevant argument for digital magazines it seems. Publishers across London are beginning to swap Adobe's InDesign tool in favour of alternative and more flexible digital design solutions. Some publishers are even reverting to PDF replicas in a cost-saving move, saving money on time, resource and quality assurance.

What is the reason for the digital fall-out with the print and design industry's most popular design tool? The main reason is the need for multiple device design layouts to be covered off by one 'design' workflow. InDesign does not create 'responsive' layouts, and also creates an 'image' of the page, as opposed to HTML layouts, which use rich text, meaning searchable functionality, shareable content, and flexible in publishing terms, i.e.: make your content once, send it wherever it needs to go. InDesign cannot do that right now unless you publish to PDF. Which is not the answer...

Its all about optimising for the reader...

When used in Adobe DPS, and a few other solutions ­ Twixl Media, Mag+ and GoMobile, for example, ­an InDesign layout is fixed to the device screen size. If I were to create an iPad-sized layout, this layout will simply not work well on iPhone or Android phone. You'd see 'letter-boxing' (black bars either side of the page, or at the top and bottom), and the font size would be far too small for a satisfactory reading experience. I would need to create a separate inDesign layout for pretty much every device screen size if I wanted each platform's digital edition to be optimised for the reader. Three times the workflow? No thanks. I enjoyed it in 2011. Not anymore.

Image1 ()

Did you try Liquid Layouts? No, I didn't either.

Adobe did try to resolve the multi-layout challenge by introducing 'Liquid Layouts' to InDesign, a semi-automated alternative layout feature - but it has never taken off - it was too complicated and time-costly to use, and also meant that your layouts had to be so strictly tagged and locked down that it offered no real flexibility for the designer. But the ease and flexibility in quickly changing your layout using InDesign is what makes it such a great design tool - for print, naturally - or if you are only making one version for iPad, perhaps.

Don't get me wrong - the ability to design an interactive edition without requiring to write massive amounts of code or employ a developer in the team is definitely the way to go for me - its just that InDesign isn't practical at all for more than one device layout, and doesn't offer the best route to a successful digital publishing model. The days of 500MB pixel-perfect digital magazines will soon to be banished to the history apps.

What if InDesign is the only way?

So if I'm asked - and I do get asked this: 'What if InDesign is the only viable solution for me?'. Then I would advise that the print issue workflow became more integrated with the digital edition, along with applying some extremely rigid templating across both print and digital - and mix in a stack of automation for extra efficiency. This would involve an InDesign scripting guru, and also the InDesign files for print would have to be so perfect, in regards to stylesheets and tagging, that the creation of the digital editions would be perhaps limited to a couple of days. You would need to stick to templates and work fast, incredibly fast.

Indesign ()

I would also probably recommend using a Content Management System that integrates into DPS or one of the other 'InDesign-based' solutions. But having said all this - it's only going to be a short while before you look for an even more data-efficient, business-efficient and more profitable process to help your digital magazines move forward.

Why publish to other platforms? Isn't everyone still on Apple devices?

The need for multiple device layouts and a more flexible 'one workflow, all devices' solution points to the recent user swing across to iPhone and Android phone devices and also Windows phones. Not that these achieve huge download numbers for digital magazines, they never have. But its vitally important for a publisher to be available across all markets and on all devices to capture as many customers as possible. The market force of users consuming content on their phones instead of tablets and in print is pushing the whole publishing world this way. 

The big shift to HTML...

It was always going to happen - and the writing was on the wall when the publishing industry realised that tablet editions were not going to grow as much as first hoped, and having three designers creating those 'pixel perfect' layouts for three or four different app stores after the print issue process, was just too demanding - even for the likes of Wired and GQ. The cost of employing three designers to create a digital edition pretty much wipes out any prospect of profit with the current digital circulation figures in mind. And also the moment that editorial content finds its way into InDesign, it'll never find its way into Apple News, Facebook's Instant Articles, or any other web CMS - other than adding another workflow. Plus this type of data takes up far less space on users devices and is faster to download via 3G, and wi-fi. Readers expect to read articles instantly, not after 20 minutes download time.

Recently, I've seen a number of publishers taking on a new way of making digital magazines. Conde Nast UK, for example, are moving over to a far more efficient method of creating their editions for all devices - more on that next time. And this year particularly, with the launch of Woodwing's innovative 'Inception', the industry-leading Pugpig, Contentment (previously Padify), PressReader and 29th Street's excellent Platypus, is the year of code-free HTML responsive design for content. There are many fantastic digital editions that use HTML solutions to make their content work harder - from Porter, Harrods, The Week, Campaign, Little White Lies, Stylist, Grazia, New Scientist, Dare, Moneyweek to name a few. 

Inception ()

All of these HTML solutions - plus Wordpress and more - provide the publisher with a more suitable way of making responsive designs for all devices, publishable to most systems and web servers. All you need for each solution is your designed templates and to learn the tools and off you go. Some of them even feature InDesign-like features to help with the learning curve! Many conveniently integrate into Adobe's DPS 2015 solution, and into Pugpig, or their own distribution platforms - so the problem now is deciding which route to take and how much to invest in learning, and implementing. Building a road map is key as ever, and, of course, talking to other publishers and experts for a second opinion...

From a design perspective, working out a way of designing your new HTML issues differently to everyone else is key. We are seeing a change in digital magazine designs as a result of user habits, demands and industry flavours - and there are limitations to designing in code compared to the free spirit that is InDesign - but I do think magazine designers will have to compromise on that InDesign 'flexibility' in making tweaks and changes to kerning, tracking, leading and typography. Hopefully, design teams will slowly begin to realise that HTML templating with expertise is just as cool - and that perhaps learning a little about CSS and how code works may benefit their career chances over the coming decade. Its going that way, and it isn't going to stop changing either - it hasn't stopped changing since April 2010 when the iPad launched.

So - back to the title - is InDesign dead in the water for digital editions?

In some ways, we may see a few publishers taking on a hybrid approach. Top Gear use InDesign to great effect - its one of the best digital editions - "in the world", and they now utilise Woodwing's Inception to create a whole section of their more templated layouts to save on time, and this means the team are then able to spend more time on other features. Whatever works for each magazine I suppose. If you can make it work - then find a balance and see which combination makes the most sense.

TopGear ()

So, no - I don't think InDesign is destined to become a print-only tool. Adobe may seek to develop its HTML capabilities - or launch a new software application to counter the rise of the new platforms mentioned earlier. And don't forget Adobe Muse and Dreamweaver - both work well but aren't optimised for digital editions, yet. And there are plenty of brand agencies and design studios who use InDesign for fantastic interactive editions of customer magazines, presentation apps, brand guidelines and sales communications apps. So if you're an InDesign DPS designer - don't lose heart - seek out those work opportunities elsewhere. Its just publishing that's apparently fallen out of love with InDesign in this instance.

More like this

10 ways to get more downloads for your digital magazines

Five ways to entice readers with your digital magazine

Pioneering digital transformation in magazines: the Immediate Media story

How to market digital magazine editions

  • How can publishers thrive in challenging times?

    [Sponsored] Recently the WoodWing team traveled to London for the FIPP World Congress. For those of you who haven’t been lucky enough to attend yet, the FIPP World Congress is the largest and most high profile media event in the world. It brings together the world’s leading multi-platform media publishers and industry suppliers, to explore the latest trends and solutions.

    25th Oct 2017 Opinion
  • Are digital editions dead?

    Digital editions have been around for a long time, going all the way back to the late 90's. But in 2010 when the iPad hit the digital runway, publishers jumped on the tablet bandwagon faster than they could shout, “Hallelujah!”. The struggling publishing industry had found itself a saviour.  

    16th Oct 2017 Opinion
  • Publishers should re-emphasise their behavioural roots to take on Facebook and Google

    With Facebook and Google predicted to take half of the World’s total digital ad-spend in 2017, it’s no surprise that other players in the industry have raised concerns. But by updating their own data offerings to better reflect advertisers needs, media owners can keep pace with changing digital trends.

    25th Aug 2017 Opinion
  • How brands can capitalise on the experiential revolution

    If I were to ask you to describe the Internet of Things (IoT), I expect many of you would start to talk about how new technology is revolutionising the internet, providing “anything connectivity” through advanced networks, sensors, electronics, and software. And you wouldn’t be wrong.

    24th Aug 2017 Opinion
  • How subscriptions became a driver of profit at The Economist

    Subscriptions have become The Economist’s biggest income stream in the past seven years. Michael Brunt, chief marketing officer and managing director, circulation at The Economist explains how they managed to transform the 174-year old title’s circulation business into the biggest driver of profits.

    9th Nov 2017 Features
  • The state of brand licensing around the world

    Recently, there has been a period of time where there was somewhat of a slow-down in international brand activity as companies focused on shoring up their bases. However, this year we have seen an increasing number of reports surfacing about media companies adopting a more global outlook again – at least in certain segments. Does this mean a renewed focus on brand licensing, and in what form? And what is the outlook as we head into 2018?

    13th Nov 2017 Features
  • CDS Global and Zeddit announce tech partnership to help publishers grow print magazine subscriptions

    CDS Global and Zeddit announced a strategic technology partnership in the UK and Australia to provide advanced subscriber conversion capabilities for print magazine publishers. The partnership will focus on improving the conversion of visitors to magazine websites into subscribers for CDS Global clients.

    13th Nov 2017 Industry News
  • How Egmont is reaping rewards from creating

    One of the biggest drives for publishers in the past decade or two have been transitioning their print content to digital. For some it is all about maintaining the magazine's brand essence online, yet others have enjoyed success in amalgamating print publications to create new web first brands.

    13th Nov 2017 Features
  • Why content should be created specific to each platform

    Publishers’ growing urge to be platform agnostic needs to be balanced by focussed efforts to ensure content remains platform specific.

    13th Nov 2017 Features


Visit our Youtube channel



FIPP newsletters allow you to keep up with industry trends, research, training and events across the world



Get global coverage of your launches, company news and innovations


Upcoming @ FIPP

What’s happening now, what’s coming next

Go to Full Site