Early last year, Medium founder and CEO Ev Williams declared the current media model broken, pointing out how ad-based publishing tends to encourage clicks more than high-quality content creation. If you’ve been following the Sterling Woods blog, you already know we agree.
Digital advertising isn’t inherently bad, but it does support tech giants more than niche publishers. The vast majority of publishers will find that monetising content directly with the reader is a more lucrative approach to building digital revenues.
In March, Williams announced Medium would do its part to rethink the publishing model, launching a membership programme designed to offer subscribers a better reading experience while simultaneously rewarding writers and content creators directly for their high-quality work.
This move is why I’m so excited to have had the opportunity to sit down with Caitlin Roman, subscriptions product manager for Medium. Here are the highlights of our talk.
As Medium evolved in recent years, leadership unpacked the data around ad-based products.
As they investigated this sort of publishing model, “It became clear the incentives for advertisers and readers were not in line,” said Roman, especially if publishers want to provide quality content to their audience. The advertising model rewards clicks and impressions over depth of reading. It’s a setup that prioritises profit over powerful work.
As Ev Williams put it in his original announcement, ad budgets are top-priority with the current publication model: “Ad-driven publishers are rewarded on their ability to capture attention… Not to provide informed perspectives, be thorough, or even be factually correct. But to capture attention. As cheaply as possible. For a few fleeting seconds.”
Of course, Roman pointed out, Medium still needs to monetise (I think all publishers would agree!), but the company also wants to feel true to its mission of “providing unique perspectives and amplifying ideas that matter.”
Enter the new membership programme. Tossing out the idea of “What’s the most clickable headline,” Medium set out to fundamentally align with readers’ needs by promoting good content to consume.
Those writers are compensated with a portion of subscription profits. Their percentage of the cut is based on several engagement metrics, including the number of members who read the story, time spent reading, and “claps.” Claps are assigned by members – ranging from 0 to 50 – and indicate how much a reader likes a story.
According to Roman, Medium would like this to be a place where writers could get non-trivial financial support. And it seems to be headed in that direction in just a short amount of time. In October 2017, 58 per cent of authors earned money, with their average payout being US$122 per writer. The highest paid writer made over $2,000.
In theory, this paywall model is an incredible opportunity for publishers and writers. But what’s the perk for subscribers? At Medium, Roman noted, you can uncover unique ideas and perspectives that you won’t find anywhere else across a diverse spectrum of topics.
Fundamentally, the subscription is about exclusive content. Members get access to the best of Medium, including exclusive subscriber-only articles that aren’t free beyond a trial number (three per month for now). And there are other benefits, too. Subscription opens up access to audio versions of popular pieces and offline reading.
What Medium has found is that content, when done right, is its own value proposition. Roman added, “At the beginning, there was less clear of a hypothesis around what members would be willing to pay for — would it be the content only or some special features?” While audio and offline reading are well-received by members, the leadership’s sense now is it’s the actual content behind the member’s willingness to enroll.
There are dozens of trial models businesses can implement to monetise their content. So, how did Medium land on their current “three free articles per month” rule?
Roman said the paywall has evolved since it launched last March. While in beta mode, the value proposition was more around supporting the mission of Medium because they didn’t have a robust offering yet. It was the diehard fans who signed up first.
At first, the exclusive content was strictly behind the paywall. In fact, there was a credit card form on each article. Needless to say, it felt a little heavy-handed.
Then, Medium moved to three free articles per month, but you still had to log in with a free Medium account to access them. It did better than the original plan because readers got a taste of the exclusive content before they subscribed. It also allowed for some lead gen, as Medium could then educate people about the offering.
But that wasn’t quite right either. Writers offered Medium some feedback. The registration element was still leading to drop off, and writers could feel it in terms of their distribution.
Most recently, Medium launched a “logged out” meter, offering three articles per month, most of which are readable without a registration wall.
On the publishing end, any publisher, small or large, can participate in the partner programme. Or, on the alternate side, anyone can continue to write for free. It’s a choice left up to writers as they produce their work.
As we’ve noted before, people will pay for content—provided the content is actually good stuff. Last March, when Medium first launched their new model, the subscriber base was an invite-only ticket. Subscribers were built of very loyal cohorts who were willing to pay to support the mission of the company.
But at this point, Roman divulged, it’s a lot less about the support of Medium, it’s more about supporting writers of quality content. Under Medium’s new model, subscribers have found themselves in a new position of power. It’s the only place where membership fees can go directly to supporting a community of writers and their work. By “clapping” for an article, readers are saying, “I really like this article,” and the author is compensated for excellence as a result.
Medium is in good company, Roman noted: “The industry-wide trend toward paying for content is very encouraging – both The New York Times and The Washington Post, among others, have built successful paywall models.” And where giants lead, smaller publishers often follow. It seems Medium’s plan to fix the broken media model is moving in the right direction.
Subscription models are an effective way to monetise content because it aligns incentives for both readers and publishers. And as more and more publishers hop on board, readers are learning that good content doesn’t come free.
Under these kinds of models, optimisation is no longer about clicks. It’s about encouraging dedicated readership through high-quality work. Instead of asking how publishers can get people to open a piece, publishers can focus on the important questions. Or as Roman asked, “How do we double down on interesting ideas and perspectives? How do we provide the best quality possible?”
More like this
There are big changes coming down the line for online publishers in 2018. As more and more large publishers move to diversify their revenues and as digital ad growth slows even for industry giants, organisations at the top of the advertising food chain are exploring how to keep businesses profitable.11th Jan 2018 Opinion
[Sponsored] Recently the WoodWing team traveled to London for the FIPP World Congress. For those of you who haven’t been lucky enough to attend yet, the FIPP World Congress is the largest and most high profile media event in the world. It brings together the world’s leading multi-platform media publishers and industry suppliers, to explore the latest trends and solutions.25th Oct 2017 Opinion
Digital editions have been around for a long time, going all the way back to the late 90's. But in 2010 when the iPad hit the digital runway, publishers jumped on the tablet bandwagon faster than they could shout, “Hallelujah!”. The struggling publishing industry had found itself a saviour.16th Oct 2017 Opinion
The realisation that Facebook is a social network first and foremost and not a news-stand is starting to hit home with publishers as Mark Zuckerberg continues to fiddle with his News Feed algorithm to salvage - or grow - his creation.15th Jan 2018 Features
It has been a record-breaking year for Meredith’s Martha Stewart Living. “Over the last year and a half, we have been doing some great things and I think we saw the results of those efforts in 2017,” said Daren Mazzucca, VP/group publisher of Martha Stewart Living.15th Jan 2018 Features
From a legislative perspective 2018 looks set to be an interesting, potentially challenging year for publishers. In May the EU wide General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) will be enforced bringing new controls on the collection of data.15th Jan 2018 Features
Cheddar Inc. launched two years ago as a news and business channel aimed at at young-ish audience that would be carried via social media, smart TV and mobile. Two years on and global expansion is high on Cheddar's agenda.11th Jan 2018 Features
Social media, and above all Facebook, took a lot of heat for its perceived role in disseminating rumour and false news, most prominently during the US election campaign in 2016. Now, the firm has announced that it will give publishers less space for promoting their content (organically) on its platform. This is of course is bad news for publishers.15th Jan 2018 Insight News
Visit our Youtube channelFIND OUT MORE
FIPP newsletters allow you to keep up with industry trends, research, training and events across the worldFIND OUT MORE
Get global coverage of your launches, company news and innovationsFIND OUT MORE
What’s happening now, what’s coming next